Deploying LLMs in Regulated Industries: The Eval Requirements You Can't Skip
Healthcare, financial services, and legal teams face stricter LLM output standards. The eval criteria that map to those requirements.
On LLM evaluation, production AI quality, and prompt engineering in the real world.
Healthcare, financial services, and legal teams face stricter LLM output standards. The eval criteria that map to those requirements.
How to structure eval runs when your team is comparing GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, and Gemini on the same task — without drowning in result tables.
The appeal of LLM-as-judge for open-ended evals, its calibration challenges, and how to combine it with deterministic criteria.
Flipping the workflow: define your quality criteria first, then iterate prompts until evals pass.
Model swap does not equal drop-in replacement. The quality assumptions that break silently when you change from GPT-4 to Claude.
Building a regression baseline, choosing eval criteria by feature type, and interpreting delta scores.
When exact-match scoring masks real quality improvements and when semantic similarity misses genuine regressions.
Step-by-step guide to wiring Fyntune into GitHub Actions and GitLab CI so every PR triggers an eval run.
The most common ways guardrail failures slip past manual review and what automated eval catches that humans miss.
Semantic similarity, factuality, coherence, and guardrail compliance — ranked by correlation with user satisfaction.
Treating prompt changes like code changes — branching, diffing, rollback. The workflow ML teams are building.
How systematic eval suites catch factual drift that A/B tests miss, with concrete eval criteria examples.